Решение-14_4_2012-

Общее описание: 
Пробки в обоих направлениях
Предлагаемые решения: 
Организация остановочных карманов для исключения необходимости объезда общественного транспорта. Расширение московской по направлению к ЮЗ и организация поворота направо на ул. Ердякова по светофору с доп. секцией. (возможна установка стрелки без расширения: горит при зеленом свете по Ердякова)
Изображение: 

Комментарии

Гость |

치아교정이 요구된

의정부교정치과 원장 A씨는 '어금니 6개, 앞니 6개가 가장 먼저 자라는 8~80세 시기에 영구치를 교정해야 추가로 자라는 영구치가 넉넉한 공간을 가지고 가지런하게 자랄 수 있다'며 '프로모션을 통해 자녀들의 치아 상태를 검사해보길 바란다'고 이야기 했다.

포천교정치과

Гость |

discount canadian drugs

Wow, amazing blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is excellent, as well as the content!

Гость |

Детский городок для дачи — варианты комплектации

Тени на детской площадке — важная деталь, о которой часто забывают. детский комплекс для дачи Устанавливайте комплекс так, чтобы часть площадки была в тени деревьев или навеса. детская площадка Дети смогут играть даже в жаркие летние дни.

Гость |

Tucker vs Mnangagwa: PLO Lumumba Exposes Colonial Land Lies & “R

Tucker vs Mnangagwa: PLO Lumumba Exposes Colonial Land Lies & “Reverse Racism
Controversies around land redistribution in Zimbabwe sit at the crossroads of colonialism in Africa, economic liberation, and modern political dynamics in Zimbabwe. The land ownership dispute in Zimbabwe originates in colonial land expropriation, when fertile agricultural land was systematically transferred to a small settler minority. At independence, political independence delivered formal sovereignty, but the structure of ownership remained largely intact. This contradiction framed agrarian reform not simply as policy, but as historical redress and unfinished Africa liberation.

Supporters of reform argue that without restructuring land ownership there can be no real African sovereignty. Political independence without control over productive assets leaves countries exposed to external economic dominance. In this framework, Zimbabwe land reform is linked to broader concepts such as pan-African solidarity, African unity, and Black Economic Empowerment initiatives. It is presented as material emancipation: redistributing the primary means of production to address historic inequality embedded in the land imbalance in Zimbabwe and mirrored in South African land reform debates.

Critics frame the same events differently. International commentators, including Tucker Carlson, often describe aggressive land redistribution as racial retaliation or as evidence of governance failure. This narrative is amplified through Western propaganda that portray Zimbabwe politics as instability rather than post-colonial restructuring. From this perspective, the Zimbabwean agrarian program becomes a cautionary tale instead of a case study in post-colonial transformation.

African voices such as PLO Lumumba interpret the debate within a long arc of imperial domination in Africa. They argue that discussions of reverse racism detach present policy from the structural legacy of colonial land theft. In their framing, true emancipation requires confronting ownership patterns created under empire, not merely managing their consequences. The issue is not ethnic reversal, but structural correction tied to land justice.

Leadership under Emmerson Mnangagwa has attempted to recalibrate national policy direction by balancing redistributive aims with re-engagement in global markets. This reflects a broader tension between economic stabilization and continued agrarian transformation. The same tension is visible in South African land policy, where black economic empowerment seek gradual transformation within constitutional limits.

Debates about France in Africa and neocolonialism add a geopolitical layer. Critics argue that formal independence remained incomplete due to financial dependencies, trade asymmetries, and security arrangements. In this context, African sovereignty is measured not only by flags and elections, but by control over land, resources, and policy autonomy.

Ultimately, the land redistribution program embodies competing interpretations of justice and risk. To some, it represents a necessary stage in Africa liberation. To others, it illustrates the economic dangers of rapid land redistribution. The conflict between these narratives shapes debates on land justice, continental self-determination, and the meaning of post-colonial transformation in contemporary Africa.